Alan Frey Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Cell Biology
CD8+ T Cell immune response to cancer
Research Summary
Cancers are antigenic and recruit CD8+ T cells into the tumor tissue, referred to as ''TIL'' for tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. However, antitumor T cells are dysfunctional and are defective in cytolysis. Since exocytosis of lytic granules may potentially be dependent upon Immune Synapse (IS) formation and non-lytic TIL cannot exocytose granules (even in re-directed assay, we considered that TIL IS formation or function is defective. Therefore, in conjugates formed between TIL and cognate tumor cells, using a combination of confocal microscopy and biochemical assays, we investigated the localization and activation status of proteins important in signal transduction, IS formation, and lytic function. Signal transduction in freshly-isolated, non-lytic TIL is defective: they do not flux calcium, activate PLCg-1, increase protein tyrosine phosphorylation, or recruit WASp, Pyk-2, F-actin and the Microtubule Organizing Ccenter (MTOC) to the target contact site (CS) formed between TIL and cognate target cells. The block in signaling is proximal since LAT is not phosphorylated and ZAP70, although recruited to the CS, is only weakly activated. Importantly, the inhibitory motif in p56lck (Y505) becomes rapidly phosphorylated upon binding to cognate tumor cells. Consistent with a proximal signaling defect, Csk is recruited to the plasma membrane and Shp-2 is retained in the cytoplasm. In addition, Shp-1 localizes at the CS where it may mediate de-activation of various SH3-containing proteins (such as ZAP70) therein preventing propagation of the activation signal. Furthermore, we show that upon contact with cognate target cells, non-lytic TIL assemble many signaling components (TCRab, CD3z, p56lck, ZAP70, LFA-1, LAT, and lipid rafts) with kinetics typical of activated CD8+ T cells, showing that non-lytic TIL are triggered by conjugate formation. However, CD2, the CD3 complex, and CD8, which associate with the TCR prior to conjugate formation, rapidly dissociate and are excluded from the CS. Tumor-induced disruption of T cell activation at a point downstream of triggering, therein blocking proximal tyrosine kinase activity, calcium flux, and dependent lytic function, is a novel mechanism for inhibition of the CD8+ T cell effector phase.
Collectively our data suggests that proximal TCR-mediated signaling in non-lytic TIL is rapidly blocked after conjugation with cognate tumor targets. The signaling defect possibly involves two inhibitory mechanisms, Csk-mediated inactivation of p56lck function and enhanced Shp-1 activity, both of which may conspire to prevent activation of proximal tyrosine kinase activity, affinity upregulation of LFA-1, and calcium flux ultimately preventing exocytosis of lytic granules. Importantly, the TIL lytic defect is an acquired property restricted to T cells within the tumor microenvironment since in vivo systemic T cell function is not affected by tumor growth whereas TIL are characterized by the inability to mobilize the MTOC to the CS and exocytose lytic granules. Acquired transient lytic defects in TIL have also been described in several transgenic TCR mouse tumor models. Consideration of the observation that human TIL are antigen-specific but non-lytic, together with our description of defective lytic function of murine TIL, supports the notion that tumor-induced inhibition of TIL lytic function may be a common characteristic which may contribute to tumor growth in the presence of antitumor immune response. Tumor-induced lytic dysfunction also may restrict T cell based immunotherapy of cancer.
Current research investigates the mechanism by which the tumor induces this profound defect in T cell signaling.
Collectively our data suggests that proximal TCR-mediated signaling in non-lytic TIL is rapidly blocked after conjugation with cognate tumor targets. The signaling defect possibly involves two inhibitory mechanisms, Csk-mediated inactivation of p56lck function and enhanced Shp-1 activity, both of which may conspire to prevent activation of proximal tyrosine kinase activity, affinity upregulation of LFA-1, and calcium flux ultimately preventing exocytosis of lytic granules. Importantly, the TIL lytic defect is an acquired property restricted to T cells within the tumor microenvironment since in vivo systemic T cell function is not affected by tumor growth whereas TIL are characterized by the inability to mobilize the MTOC to the CS and exocytose lytic granules. Acquired transient lytic defects in TIL have also been described in several transgenic TCR mouse tumor models. Consideration of the observation that human TIL are antigen-specific but non-lytic, together with our description of defective lytic function of murine TIL, supports the notion that tumor-induced inhibition of TIL lytic function may be a common characteristic which may contribute to tumor growth in the presence of antitumor immune response. Tumor-induced lytic dysfunction also may restrict T cell based immunotherapy of cancer.
Current research investigates the mechanism by which the tumor induces this profound defect in T cell signaling.
Related Documents
schematic of TCR-mediated signaling in lytic and non-lytic TIL
TCR signaling in TIL Panel a Lytic TIL. Because lytic TIL are no longer under the influence of the tumor, TCR stimulation induces the signaling cascade which results in full activation of ZAP-70. This initiates subsequent downstream events such as: calcium flux, activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway, and MTOC and lytic granule mobilization. Because Shp-2 is recruited to the tumor cell:TIL contact site rapidly upon recognition of tumor cells, it can dephosphorylate Cbp thereby blocking recruitment of Csk and PEP into proximity to their substrate p56lck. Panel b Non-lytic TIL. Upon TCR stimulation, non-lytic TIL initiate triggering: activation of p56lck, phosphorylation of CD3zeta, and recruitment of ZAP-70. However, due to an unknown contribution by the tumor, transduction of the signal cannot progress past recruitment of ZAP-70. Instead, p56lck feedback inhibition pathways are activated involving recruitment to the CS of the negative regulator Csk, which phosphorylates p56lck at the inhibitory motif (Y505). (PEP recruitment is suggested by the recruitment of its interacting partner Csk, but has yet to be determined). Csk is recruited to the CS by its binding partner Cbp. In addition, Shp-1 is recruited to the CS where it may interact with its substrates. This causes early termination of the TCR signaling cascade, preventing calcium flux and MTOC and lytic granule recruitment.
Related Images
FIGURE 2. CD2, CD3 , CD3 , and CD8 do not colocalize with TCR in TIL conjugates. TIL were analyzed by confocal microscopy, as described in Materials and Methods. Single Z-stack images of labeling taken at the top surface, the middle (at the CS), and the bottom surface of the TIL are included for experiments that display a puncta phenotype to emphasize the membrane distribution of labeling. Arrows indicate the TIL:target cell CS. The percentage of TIL with TCR localized at the CS is: 42% (nonlytic) and 46% (lytic). The percentage of TIL with CD43 and CD45 excluded from the CS is: 45% (nonlytic) and 49% (lytic), and 22% (nonlytic) and 30% (lytic), respectively. LFA-1 is localized at the CS in: 45% (nonlytic) and 53% (lytic) of conjugates, and lipid rafts localized at the CS in: 29% (nonlytic) and 41% (lytic). The percentage of TIL with CD2 in puncta is 76% (nonlytic) and 10% (lytic). Five percent of nonlytic TIL show localization of CD2 at the CS, and 51% of lytic TIL localize CD2 at the CS. The percentage of TIL with CD3 in punctais: 71% (nonlytic) and 2% (lytic). Nine percent of nonlytic TIL show localization of CD3 at the CS, and 42% of lytic TIL localize CD3 at the CS. The percentage of TIL with CD3 in puncta is: 67% (nonlytic) and 10% (lytic). Fourteen percent of nonlytic TIL show localization of CD3 at the CS, and 40% of lytic TIL localize CD3 at the CS. The percentage of TIL with CD8 in puncta is: 79% (nonlytic) and 2% (lytic). Six percent of nonlytic TIL show localization of CD8 at the CS, and 49% of lytic TIL localize CD8 at the CS. Although TCR and lipid rafts localize to the CS (A and C) and CD43 and CD45 are excluded from the immunological synapse, LFA-1 localizes to the p-SMAC (B), and CD2, CD3 , CD3 , and CD8 do not localize to the CS in nonlytic TIL (D).
Research Information
Research Interests
CD8+ T Cell immune esponse in cancer
Research Keywords
immune response in cancer, tumor immunology, vaccine therapy



Print